The decision by Arizona officials to support a Utah lawsuit – questioning the constitutionality of the federal government owning unappropriated public lands – poses a disturbing risk to wildlife, recreation, and our sporting heritage in Arizona and across the nation. Despite support for this lawsuit from Arizona Senate President Warren Petersen and Speaker of the House Ben Toma, their stance does not reflect the views of Arizonans,  an overwhelming majority of who support protecting and conserving public lands. These lands sustain iconic western species like bighorn sheep, mule deer, and pronghorn, support a huge outdoor recreation economy, and are vital for Arizona’s rich outdoor heritage.

"Arizona's public lands provide vital habitat for wildlife, migration corridors, and countless opportunities for hunting, fishing, hiking, bicycling, kayaking, you name it," said Michael Cravens, Advocacy and Conservation Director of the Arizona Wildlife Federation (AWF). “The stakes in this case extend far beyond Utah and the outcome of this lawsuit threatens to set a precedent that could undermine public access and conservation priorities for generations.”

The lawsuit seeks state control over 18.5 million acres of federal public lands in Utah, but the outcome could have severe implications for Arizona’s iconic landscapes and outdoor traditions. If successful, the lawsuit could pave the way for the privatization and development of public lands, threatening the integrity of wildlife habitats, and limiting public access. These lands belong to all Americans and provide essential ecological, recreational, and economic benefits, which are at risk if ownership shifts to states with a mandate to maximize revenue. States also face immense challenges managing lands on a scale comparable to the federal government, including critical wildfire suppression, habitat conservation, and public access maintenance. 

For over 100 years, the Arizona Wildlife Federation has championed the right of all Americans to access and enjoy Arizona’s unique landscapes. This commitment is precisely why AWF stands firmly against Utah’s lawsuit, which threatens to undermine public land protections and the outdoor heritage that Arizonans value deeply. 

“Arizona’s public lands are irreplaceable,” said Scott or Michael, Position Title of the Arizona Wildlife Federation. “We urge Arizona officials who have extended their support of this lawsuit to listen to the overwhelming voices in Arizona who want to keep our public lands in public hands.”